[racket] typed/racket and contract boundaries

This is likely a bug, but I cannot reproduce using the following
program. Do you have a small test case?

#lang racket/load

(module typed typed/racket
  (provide foo)
  (: foo (Number -> Number))
  (define (foo x) (add1 x)))

(module untyped racket
  (require 'typed)
  (foo 4))

(require 'untyped)

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Spencer Florence <spencer at florence.io> wrote:
> I have a typed module being required by a normal #lang racket module.
>
> When I call a function from the typed module I get this error:
>
> default-blame-format: contract violation
>   expected: a blame object with a non-#f positive field
>   given: #<blame>
>
>
> Can someone give me some insight into what is going on?
>
> --spencer
>
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>