[racket] Style. for/fold for/list for/lists

I advocate it too, when I don't have to iterate through arbitrary do-sequences.
-Ian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Van Dyke" <neil at neilvandyke.org>
To: "Roman Klochkov" <kalimehtar at mail.ru>
Cc: users at racket-lang.org
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 8:19:12 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket] Style. for/fold for/list for/lists

Roman Klochkov wrote at 01/18/2014 06:25 AM:
> Where can I find style guide for these
>
> for/lists:

Wouldn't it be easier to do with named-"let"?

I advocate named-"let" sometimes on this email list.  Here's the first 
one I found in Google:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2012-April/051686.html

Neil V.

____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users