[racket] syntax-parse question
On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Alexander D. Knauth <alexander at knauth.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Alexander D. Knauth <alexander at knauth.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:10 PM, Kevin Forchione <lysseus at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 5, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard <jensaxel at soegaard.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this a step in the right direction?
>>>>
>>>> (define-syntax (x stx)
>>>> (syntax-parse stx
>>>> [(_ (y ... (z ...) w ...))
>>>> #'(xf (yf y ... (zf z ...) w ...))]))
>>>>
>>>> The pattern (z ...) ... will match a sequence of lists such as (4 5 6) (7 8)
>>>> but it won't match (4 5 6) 7 8 from your example.
>>>>
>>>> /Jens Axel
>>>
>>> Closer. It doesn’t match something like ‘( 1 2 3 (4 5 6) 7 (8 9) 10), for instance.
>>
>> For that I think you want something like this:
>> (syntax-parse stx
>> [(_ (~or (z ...)
>> y)
>> ...)
>> #'(xf (yf y ... (zf z ...)))])
>
> Sorry I forgot an ellipsis. I meant this:
> (syntax-parse stx
> [(_ (~or (z ...)
> y)
> ...)
> #'(xf (yf y ... (zf z ...) ...))])
Remarkably difficult just to parse what amounts to nested lists! This doesn’t quite do what I want either. For instance:
#lang racket
(require (for-syntax syntax/parse))
#;(define-syntax (x stx)
(define-syntax-class binding
#:description "binding list"
(pattern (z:number ...)))
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ b:binding ...)
#'(list (list b.z ...) ...)]))
#;(define-syntax (x stx)
(define-syntax-class lbinding
#:description "binding list"
(pattern (z:number ...)))
(define-syntax-class orbinding
#:description "binding or"
(pattern (y:number ...)
#:with (z ...) #'(y ...))
(pattern (lb:lbinding)
#:with (z ...) #'(lb.z ...)))
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ ob:orbinding ...)
#'(list (list ob.z ...) ...)]))
#;(define-syntax (x stx)
(define-syntax-class lbinding
#:description "binding list"
(pattern (z:number ...)))
(define-syntax-class orbinding
#:description "binding or"
(pattern (y:number ...)
#:with (z ...) #'(y ...))
(pattern (lb:lbinding)
#:with (z ...) #'(lb.z ...)))
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ ob:orbinding ...)
#'(list (list ob.z ...) ...)]))
(define-syntax (x stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ (~or (z ...)
y)
...)
#'(list (list y ... (list z ...) ...))]))
(x (1 2 3 4) (5 (6 7) 8))
expands to: (list (list (list 1 2 3 4) (list 5 (6 7) 8))))) instead of (list (list (list 1 2 3 4) (list 5 (list 6 7) 8))))).
-Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20140806/c702ee90/attachment.html>