[racket] Immutable vectors

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Sun Sep 8 02:49:50 EDT 2013

On Sep 7, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:

> That sounds reasonable, but in the scenario we are discussing
> (accessing data structures implemented in Typed Racket from
> plain Racket), the data structure never passes in that direction,
> except if it's constructed from a plain Racket data structure,
> and even then the border is crossed only once. So why should element
> access be expensive?

Most likely NO. 

Posted on the users mailing list.