From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Sun Sep 8 02:49:50 EDT 2013 |
|
On Sep 7, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > That sounds reasonable, but in the scenario we are discussing > (accessing data structures implemented in Typed Racket from > plain Racket), the data structure never passes in that direction, > except if it's constructed from a plain Racket data structure, > and even then the border is crossed only once. So why should element > access be expensive? Most likely NO.
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|