[racket] Data Exchange Format for Racket

a) You didn't mention this as a constraint.

b) read/write is a pure text format and is like Racket code. I
consider this human readable/editable.

c) serialize/deserialize is technically the same as read/write, but it
has many more invariants that makes it effectively not human
readable/editable.

Jay

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Ben Duan <yfefyf at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jay. But is it human readable and editable?
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> If you want to commit to Racket, I think the most convenient choice
>> will be read/write and then serialize/deserialize, which are all in
>> the standard Racket distribution.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Ben Duan <yfefyf at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>> > I need a data exchange format to serve as a simple database. There are
>> > several choices out there. Do you have any suggestions on how to choose
>> > between them?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ben
>> >
>> > ____________________
>> >   Racket Users list:
>> >   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
>> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
>> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay
>>
>> "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
>
>



-- 
Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay

"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93