[racket] web-server/templates: "require: not at module level or top level"

So I have a delayed-reaction question.

Why separate `require` and `local-require`?

It looks like `local-require` works at module level or top level; it
_seems_ equivalent to `require` there.

Why not just have `require` _be_ `local-require`?

Or is there some cost or penalty to `local-require` that makes it
worthwhile to have available and use the limited `require`?


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Greg Hendershott
<greghendershott at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Of course, local-require works fine because local-require can go at
>> any scope and position.
>
> I didn't know about `local-require`.
>
> I tried and it works perfectly. Thanks!