[racket] call-with-timeout

Eli Barzilay wrote at 11/15/2013 05:18 PM:
> Not a direct answer -- but did you consider `call-with-limits'?

I don't know how reliable limits are, nor how they'd interact with the 
other complexity of this system uses.  (And I thought I'd heard people 
complain before about limits not seeming to be enforced as they'd 
expect.)  However, if someone can say that limits are more reliable than 
the mechanism I posted, then I want to use limits.

Neil V.