[racket] Reasonable subset of packages in 5.3.6 for "minimal" installation?

My guess is that this isn't going to work easily for v5.3.6.

For the next release, of course, we're directly supporting the idea of
a minimal installation. But we had to shuffle things a little to arrive
at a minimal set of libraries, and you wouldn't want to repeat that
work.

At Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:33:03 -0400, Josh Tilles wrote:
> Context for my question: I'm working on the Homebrew formula for
> Racket<https://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/pull/22420>,
> and I'd like to offer a version that has as few dependencies as possible.
> From what I've seen of the current state of the repository, it seems like
> the PLTeam has already adopted the ideas that Matthew Flatt explored in
> min-racket <https://github.com/mflatt/min-racket>. I've tried to reproduce
> a similar situation with the 5.3.6 release.
> 
> From all of the packages that are usually installed by default in
> 5.3.6<https://github.com/plt/racket/tree/ded0c4a8474baa61ac84fb27dfb5353965fb75
> 6b/collects>,
> I selected the following:
> 
>    - compiler
>    - data
>    - db
>    - dynext
>    - ffi
>    - file
>    - json
>    - launcher
>    - net
>    - openssl
>    - pkg
>    - planet
>    - racket
>    - raco
>    - reader
>    - s-exp
>    - setup
>    - syntax
>    - unstable
>    - version
>    - xml
> 
> So, is this reasonable? Or is it a misguided idea, fated to plunge users of
> Homebrew into a morass of mysterious errors?
> 
> Thank you for any guidance,
> --Josh
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users