[racket] Compiling Racket for Command-Line Use Only

What is the roadmap with min-Racket?   Here I'm assuming min-Racket as the
eventual official core racket release and everything else a layered add-on
via the package management system, Planet(N) et al.  Which is something I'd
very much like to see as a direction.

FWIW, I would remove json and db from min-Racket.




On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:

> You could also try
>
>   https://github.com/mflatt/min-racket
>
> At Sun, 19 May 2013 11:19:30 -0600, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> > I think most of the graphical stuff should be loaded at runtime, and you
> > should not need those libraries just to compile racket.
> >
> > On 05/19/2013 11:16 AM, Nathan Campos wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >     I was thinking about using Racket in my HP Jornada 720 (running
> Linux of
> > course) just for fun, since it's a cool little machine. The problem is
> that
> > Racket requires FLTK and a all the stuff to run the graphical
> environment and
> > libraries, which will make a process a lot harder, since I'll have to
> compile
> > all the X11 stuff, then compile FLTK, then Racket.
> > >
> > >     Since all the projects I'll run there are going to be built for
> > command-line, is there any flag I can set to make Racket compile only the
> > command-line stuff and ignore the graphical part?
> > >
> > > *Nathan Campos*
> > > http://about.me/nathanpc
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________
> > >   Racket Users list:
> > >   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
> >
> > ____________________
> >   Racket Users list:
> >   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130520/7fff4fba/attachment.html>