[racket] DSLs and complexity

From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 21 09:59:38 EDT 2013

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Sean Kanaley <skanaley at gmail.com> wrote:
> As a simple example, consider the language "Brainfuck".  It would be wise to
> write a DSL with it called "Scheme", where the domain is actual programming.
> The user would be far more productive.

Noted without comment: http://hashcollision.org/brainfudge/


Posted on the users mailing list.