| From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Mon Jun 10 14:28:32 EDT 2013 |
|
On Jun 10, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Sean Kanaley wrote: > But if I had to choose which language seems to actually produce better code, I would have to side with PicoLisp. I wonder whether we could implement pico as a language and then write #lang racket/pico and just reuse the PicoLisp code. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130610/494503ee/attachment.html>
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}