[racket] Splicing `values' in-place

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 11 15:18:56 EDT 2013

On Jul 11, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Laurent wrote:

> Then why not return lists instead of values? 

Error checking. See Dybvig's paper, which extensively explores multiple value implementations: 

> J. Michael Ashley and R. Kent Dybvig. An efficient implementation of multiple return values in Scheme. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Lisp and Functional Programming, 140-149, June 1994. Describes Chez Scheme's implementation of the Scheme multiple return values interface.

On: http://www.cs.indiana.edu/chezscheme/pubs/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130711/61fb11d5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130711/61fb11d5/attachment.p7s>

Posted on the users mailing list.