[racket] init and init-field

On 2013-01-09 14:20:27 -0500, Harry Spier wrote:
> Can someone give me an example where its necessary (or even better) to
> use "init" instead of "init-field"

Fields are always public unless you use `define-local-member-name`, so
if you don't want to expose your state you are better off with the
internal definition (which is private). There may be other reasons too.

Cheers,
Asumu