[racket] Racket v5.3.3

I had a problem with my test code that led me to believe that the 64-bit
version of 5.3.3 was faster than the 32-bit version... to paraphrase SNL
from the good old days: "never mind."

I still do see crashes on the 64-bit version and not on 32-bit:  The
crashes still seem random, but do seem to occur more often in the debugger.

Regards,
-Joe


On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Joe Gilray <jgilray at gmail.com> wrote:

> Has anyone else noticed that the 64-bit version on Win7 is faster than the
> 32-bit version?
>
> I thought that the longer pointers were supposed to slow down execution.
>
> BTW, still seeing some crashes on 64-bit and none on 32-bit
>
> Thoughts?
> -Joe
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Joe Gilray <jgilray at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Racketeers,
>>
>> I am still seeing crashes on Win7 64bit with 5.3.3.  About every 6 hours
>> or so I get "program not responding" (doesn't seem to correlate to anything
>> in particular).
>>
>> Haven't seen it on Win7 32 bit.
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Racket version 5.3.3 is now available from
>>>
>>>   http://racket-lang.org/
>>>
>>> This is a bug-fix release to address a flaw in DrRacket v5.3.2
>>> concerning interactions between the contour window and the syntax
>>> coloring.
>>>
>>> Feedback Welcome,
>>> --
>>>           ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>>>                     http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
>>> ____________________
>>>   Racket Users list:
>>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130225/6491ff31/attachment.html>