[racket] Rosetta Code
On 19/02/13 00:33, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Yes, that's the conclusion they come to but did they act on it?
I suspect that with it being a Wiki in nature, any amount of discussion
can go on around the Village Pump (or whatever), but it's up to the
contributors themselves to "act on it" themselves.
So I'm going to have a crack at some tasks label them as "racket", and
see if I'm brought to the Village Socks. I'm just making sure nobody here
will come armed with tomatoes :-)
Tim
> On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:44 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> The discussion on that page seems to be pretty well argued for the Right
>> Thing, namely that Racket is a separate language.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Asumu Takikawa <asumu at ccs.neu.edu
>> <mailto:asumu at ccs.neu.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-02-18 12:47:21 +0000, Tim Brown wrote:
>> > I've just had a poke around and seen that Racket is considered a
>> dialect
>> > of scheme, and there are many tasks that have the scheme entry
>> marked as
>> > "works with racket", but not in a way that shows the task is
>> implemented
>> > as a Racket example. (I've just looked at
>> Category:Programming_Languages,
>> > and Racket isn't even listed).
>>
>> It used to be listed as a separate language actually. There was some
>> dicussion here:
>> http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category_talk:Racket
>>
>> I'm not sure what the policy is, if there is one.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Asumu
--
Tim Brown <tim.brown at cityc.co.uk> | City Computing Limited |
T: +44 20 8770 2110 | City House, Sutton Park Road |
F: +44 20 8770 2130 | Sutton, Surrey, SM1 2AE, GB |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
BEAUTY: What's in your eye when you have a bee in your hand |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------'
City Computing Limited registered in London No. 1767817.
Registered Office: City House, Sutton Park Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM1 2AE
VAT number 372 8290 34.