[racket] size_t and FFI?

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 13 16:29:01 EST 2013

At Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:39:57 -0500, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> On 02/13/2013 02:12 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > Veer: any opinion on whether we should break your code? :)
> It may not even break - wouldn't it just shadow the imported one?

No. Definitions in a module shadow the bindings of a language --- which
is why we have a freer hand when adding to `racket/base' --- but they
conflict with bindings from explicitly `require'd modules.

Posted on the users mailing list.