From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Wed Feb 13 16:29:01 EST 2013 |
|
At Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:39:57 -0500, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote: > On 02/13/2013 02:12 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > Veer: any opinion on whether we should break your code? :) > > It may not even break - wouldn't it just shadow the imported one? No. Definitions in a module shadow the bindings of a language --- which is why we have a freer hand when adding to `racket/base' --- but they conflict with bindings from explicitly `require'd modules.
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|