[racket] Dynamic Require of Syntax

Actually what does it mean to access syntactic extensions at run-time? 


On Feb 1, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Dan Grossman wrote:

> 
> Cody and I would love an answer to this question from 1.5 months ago if anybody can point us in the right direction and/or ask us to clarify the question.  Or if the answer is "that is not possible" then we'll do something else.
> 
> Much thanks!
> 
> --Dan
> 
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Cody Schroeder <codeblack08 at gmail.com> wrote:
>   I'm in a position that I would like to use dynamic-require to gain access to all of the provides in a module.  This is quite straightforward for normal procedures, but I also want this to include syntax.  However, I get this error when trying to dynamically require the blah macro from my test module:
> 
> (dynamic-require "test.rkt" 'blah)
> blah: use does not match pattern: (blah body) in: blah
> 
>   From the spec, it says that "If the module exports provided as syntax, then a use of the binding is expanded and evaluated in a fresh namespace to which the module is attached" when using dynamic-require.  I don't understand how it's being used, though.
> 
>   Is there a way to use dynamic-require how I want?  Is there a better way?
> 
> Cody
> 
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
> 
> 
> ____________________
>  Racket Users list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130201/8fe2b80d/attachment.html>