[racket] define-match-expander
I was seeing if it would work with nested patterns and quasiquoted
patterns and it didn't, so I had to change the rewrite function and
use (vector? (syntax-e pat)) to check for a vector written like
`#(,a:num ,b:num ,c:num).
like this:
(define (rewrite pat)
(cond [(identifier? pat) (let* ([pat-sym (syntax->datum pat)]
[pat-str (symbol->string pat-
sym)])
(if (id:type? pat-str)
(parse-pat-str pat-str stx)
pat))]
[(syntax->list pat) (datum->syntax pat (map rewrite
(syntax->list pat)))]
[(vector? (syntax-e pat)) (datum->syntax pat (vector-map
rewrite (syntax-e pat)))]
[else (print pat) (newline) (error "I don't know what to
do. given:" pat)]))
For the vector thing, I had to put a special clause in that did a
vector-map instead of a map.
Is there any other stuff (like the #(1 2 3) notation for vectors) that
I should be worried about, or is there another way to write the
rewrite function to handle stuff like this that wouldn't require a
cond case for every type of data that pat could be?
The whole thing is here:
#lang racket
(require rackunit)
(require (for-syntax
(only-in lang/htdp-intermediate-lambda
string-contains?)
racket/string
racket/match
racket/vector))
(begin-for-syntax
(define (type-str->stx-type-pred type-str)
(match type-str
["num" #'number?]
["str" #'string?]
["sym" #'symbol?]
["lst" #'list?]
["vec" #'vector?]
["bool" #'boolean?]
["proc" #'procedure?]
[_ #f]))
(define (split str) (string-split str ":"))
(define (parse-pat-str pat-str stx)
(match (split pat-str)
[(list pat-name-str type-str)
(with-syntax ([type-pred (type-str->stx-type-pred type-str)]
[pat-name (datum->syntax stx (string->symbol pat-
name-str))])
#'(? type-pred pat-name))]))
(define (id:type? str)
(and (string-contains? ":" str)
(= 2 (length (split str)))
(type-str->stx-type-pred (cadr (split str)))))
)
(define-match-expander :pat
(lambda (stx)
(define (rewrite pat)
(cond [(identifier? pat) (let* ([pat-sym (syntax->datum pat)]
[pat-str (symbol->string pat-
sym)])
(if (id:type? pat-str)
(parse-pat-str pat-str stx)
pat))]
[(syntax->list pat) (datum->syntax pat (map rewrite
(syntax->list pat)))]
[(vector? (syntax-e pat)) (datum->syntax pat (vector-map
rewrite (syntax-e pat)))]
[else (print pat) (newline) (error "I don't know what to
do. given:" pat)]))
(syntax-case stx ()
[(_ pat) (identifier? #'pat) (rewrite #'pat)]
[(_ (pat ...))
(with-syntax ([(p ...) (map rewrite (syntax->list #'(pat ...)))])
(syntax/loc stx (p ...)))]
[(_ pat) #'pat])))
(define-syntax (:match stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
[(:match val-expr [pat . more] ...)
(with-syntax ([(new-pat ...) (for/list ([pat-stx (in-list (syntax-
>list #'(pat ...)))])
(datum->syntax pat-stx `(:pat ,
(syntax->datum pat-stx))))])
#'(match val-expr [new-pat . more] ...))]))
(check-equal? (:match 1 [n:num n]) 1)
(check-equal? (:match 'x [n:num n] [_ 2]) 2)
(check-equal? (:match "string" [s:str s]) "string")
(check-equal? (:match 'x [s:str s] [_ 2]) 2)
(check-equal? (:match (list 1 2 3) [l:lst l]) (list 1 2 3))
(check-equal? (:match 'x [l:lst l] [_ 2]) 2)
(check-equal? (:match (vector 1 2 3) [v:vec v]) (vector 1 2 3))
(check-equal? (:match 'x [v:vec v] [_ 2]) 2)
(check-equal? (:match #t [b:bool b]) #t)
(check-equal? (:match #f [b:bool b]) #f)
(check-equal? (:match 'x [b:bool b] [_ 2]) 2)
(check-equal? (:match 'x [l l]) 'x)
(check-equal? (:match '(2 x "foo" (3 4)) [(list n s f l) (list n s f
l)]) '(2 x "foo" (3 4)))
(check-equal? (:match '(42 x) [(list n:num s:sym) (list n s)]) '(42 x))
(check-equal? (:match '(1 2 #(1 2 3 (1 2 3 4)))
[(list a:num b:num (vector a:num b:num c:num
(list a:num b:num c:num d:num)))
(list a b c d)])
(list 1 2 3 4))
(check-equal? (:match '(1 2 #(1 2 3 (1 2 3 4)))
[`(,a:num ,b:num #(,a:num ,b:num ,c:num
(,a:num ,b:num ,c:num ,d:num)))
(list a b c d)])
(list 1 2 3 4))
On Dec 29, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
> I'm not really sure why this works either, but try this:
>
> (define-syntax (:match stx)
> (syntax-case stx ()
> [(:match val-expr [pat . more] ...)
> (with-syntax ([(new-pat ...) (for/list ([pat-stx (in-list
> (syntax->list #'(pat ...)))])
> (datum->syntax pat-stx `(:pat ,
> (syntax->datum pat-stx))))])
> #'(match val-expr [new-pat . more] ...))]))
>
> (check-equal? (:match '(42 x) [(list n:num s:sym) (list n s)])
> (match '(42 x) [(:pat (list n:num s:sym)) (list n s)]))
>
> On Dec 29, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> I extended your example to allow other patterns than symbols
>> inside :pat.
>>
>>> (match '(42 x) [(:pat (list n:num s:sym)) (list n s)])
>> (list 42 x)
>>
>> This works fine. I now want to "hide" the :pat, that is I want to
>> write:
>>
>> (:match '(42 x) [(list n:num s:sym) (list n s)])
>>
>> Since the syntax of match is: (match val-expr clause ...) and each
>> clause
>> has the form [pat . more] we can rewrite pat to [(:pat pat) .
>> more].
>>
>> So I tried this:
>>
>> (define-syntax (:match stx)
>> (syntax-case stx ()
>> [(_ val-expr [pat . more] ...)
>> #'(match val-expr [(:pat pat) . more] ...)]))
>>
>> This doesn't work however. I am tempted to consider this a bug in
>> match,
>> but I am not sure.
>>
>> #lang racket
>> (require (for-syntax (only-in lang/htdp-intermediate-lambda string-
>> contains?)
>> racket/string
>> racket/match)
>> rackunit)
>>
>> (begin-for-syntax
>> (define (type-str->stx-type-pred type-str)
>> (match type-str
>> ["num" #'number?]
>> ["str" #'string?]
>> ["sym" #'symbol?]
>> ["lst" #'list?]
>> [_ #f]))
>>
>> (define (split str) (string-split str ":"))
>>
>> (define (parse-pat-str pat-str stx)
>> (match (split pat-str)
>> [(list pat-name-str type-str)
>> (with-syntax ([type-pred (type-str->stx-type-pred type-str)]
>> [pat-name (datum->syntax stx (string->symbol
>> pat-name-str))])
>> #'(? type-pred pat-name))]))
>>
>> (define (id:type? str)
>> (and (string-contains? ":" str)
>> (type-str->stx-type-pred (cadr (split str))))))
>>
>> (define-match-expander :pat
>> (lambda (stx)
>> (define (rewrite pat)
>> (let* ([pat-sym (syntax->datum pat)]
>> [pat-str (symbol->string pat-sym)])
>> (if (id:type? pat-str)
>> (parse-pat-str pat-str stx)
>> pat)))
>> (syntax-case stx ()
>> [(_ pat) (identifier? #'pat) (rewrite #'pat)]
>> [(_ (pat ...))
>> (with-syntax ([(p ...) (map rewrite (syntax->list
>> #'(pat ...)))])
>> (syntax/loc stx (p ...)))]
>> [(_ pat) #'pat])))
>>
>> (define-syntax (:match stx)
>> (syntax-case stx ()
>> [(_ val-expr [pat . more] ...)
>> #'(match val-expr [(:pat pat) . more] ...)]))
>>
>>
>> (check-equal? (match 1 [(:pat n:num) n]) 1)
>> (check-equal? (match 'x [(:pat n:num) n] [_ 2]) 2)
>>
>> (check-equal? (match "string" [(:pat s:str) s]) "string")
>> (check-equal? (match 'x [(:pat s:str) s] [_ 2]) 2)
>>
>> (check-equal? (match (list 1 2 3) [(:pat l:lst) l]) (list 1 2 3))
>> (check-equal? (match 'x [(:pat l:lst) l] [_ 2]) 2)
>>
>> (check-equal? (match 'x [(:pat l) l]) 'x)
>>
>> (check-equal? (match '(2 x "foo" (3 4)) [(:pat (list n s f l))
>> (list n
>> s f l)]) '(2 x "foo" (3 4)))
>> (check-equal? (match '(42 x) [(:pat (list n:num s:sym)) (list n
>> s)]) '(42 x))
>>
>>
>> (match '(42 x) [(:pat (list n:num s:sym)) (list n s)])
>> ; (:match '(42 x) [(list n:num s:sym) (list n s)])
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/12/28 Alexander D.Knauth <alexander at knauth.org>:
>>> I just wrote a match-expander that does something like that:
>>>
>>> (check-equal? (match 1 [(my-pat n:num) n]) 1)
>>> (check-equal? (match 'x [(my-pat n:num) n] [_ 2]) 2)
>>>
>>> like this:
>>>
>>> #lang racket
>>>
>>> (require rackunit)
>>> (require (for-syntax
>>> (only-in lang/htdp-intermediate-lambda
>>> string-contains?)
>>> racket/string
>>> racket/match))
>>>
>>> (define-match-expander my-pat
>>> (lambda (stx)
>>> (syntax-case stx ()
>>> [(my-pat pat)
>>> (let* ([pat-sym (syntax->datum #'pat)]
>>> [pat-str (symbol->string pat-sym)])
>>> (cond [(not (string-contains? ":" pat-str))
>>> #'pat]
>>> [else
>>> (parse-pat-str pat-str stx)]))])))
>>>
>>> (define-for-syntax (parse-pat-str pat-str stx)
>>> (let ([split-pat (string-split pat-str ":")])
>>> (match split-pat
>>> [(list pat-name-str type-str)
>>> (with-syntax ([type-pred (type-str->stx-type-pred type-str)]
>>> [pat-name (datum->syntax stx (string->symbol
>>> pat-name-str))])
>>> #'(? type-pred pat-name))])))
>>>
>>> (define-for-syntax (type-str->stx-type-pred type-str)
>>> (match type-str
>>> ["num" #'number?]
>>> ["str" #'string?]
>>> ["lst" #'list?]))
>>>
>>> (check-equal? (match 1 [(my-pat n:num) n]) 1)
>>> (check-equal? (match 'x [(my-pat n:num) n] [_ 2]) 2)
>>>
>>> (check-equal? (match "string" [(my-pat s:str) s]) "string")
>>> (check-equal? (match 'x [(my-pat s:str) s] [_ 2]) 2)
>>>
>>> (check-equal? (match (list 1 2 3) [(my-pat l:lst) l]) (list 1 2 3))
>>> (check-equal? (match 'x [(my-pat l:lst) l] [_ 2]) 2)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 26, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>>>
>>> The match pattern (? number? n) matches number and
>>> binds it to n.
>>>
>>> (match 1 [(? number? n) n])
>>>
>>> 1
>>>
>>> I'd like to write (match 1 [n:num n]) instead.
>>>
>>> Since there is no define-identifier-match-expander I have
>>> tried to make (match 1 [(n:num) n]) work. I need a hint.
>>>
>>> Here is a non-working attempt:
>>>
>>> (define-match-expander n:num
>>> (λ(stx)
>>> (syntax-case stx ()
>>> [(id)
>>> (with-syntax ([n (syntax/loc #'id n)])
>>> #'(? number? n))])))
>>>
>>>
>>> (check-equal? (match 1 [(n:num) n]) 1)
>>> (check-equal? (match 'x [(n:num) n] [_ 2]) 2)
>>>
>>> /Jens Axel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jens Axel Søgaard
>>>
>>> ____________________
>>> Racket Users list:
>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Jens Axel Søgaard
>
> ____________________
> Racket Users list:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20131229/4bfe2f3c/attachment-0001.html>