[racket] contracts on functions that take arbitrary keyword arguments
Rackety but otherwise okay
#lang racket
(require rackunit)
(define (make-keyword-procedure-contract kws/c kw-args/c rest/c range/c)
(define all-contracts (list kws/c kw-args/c rest/c range/c))
(make-contract
#:name `(make-keyword-procedure-contract , at all-contracts)
#:first-order procedure?
#:projection (apply make-projection (map contract-projection all-contracts))))
(define (make-projection kws/c kw-args/c rest/c range/c)
(lambda (blame)
(lambda (f)
(unless (procedure? f)
(raise-blame-error blame f '(expected: "procedure?" given: "~e") f))
(make-keyword-procedure
(lambda (kws kw-args . rest-args)
(define (blame-context s) (blame-add-context blame s #:swap? #t))
(define kws-check (kws/c (blame-context "the keyword list of")))
(define kw-args-check (kw-args/c (blame-context "the keywords-arguments list of")))
(define rest-check (rest/c (blame-context "the arguments list of")))
(define range-check (range/c (blame-add-context blame "the range of")))
(call-with-values
(lambda () (keyword-apply f (kws-check kws) (kw-args-check kw-args) (rest-check rest-args)))
range-check))))))
(define-syntax match?/c
(syntax-rules ()
[(match?/c pat)
(flat-named-contract '(match?/c pat) (match-lambda [pat #t] [_ #f]))]
[(match?/c pat #:when c)
(flat-named-contract '(match?/c pat #:when condition) (match-lambda [pat #:when c #t] [_ #f]))]))
;; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
;; some tests
(with-handlers ([exn:fail:contract? void])
(define/contract not-a-function
(make-keyword-procedure-contract (listof keyword?) list? list? (const #t))
"not-a-function")
(error 'not-a-function "control flow should not reach this point"))
(define/contract contracted-apply
(make-keyword-procedure-contract
(listof keyword?)
list?
(match?/c (list (? procedure? f) arg ... (? list? rest-args)))
(const #t))
(make-keyword-procedure
(lambda (kws kw-args f . rest-args)
(keyword-apply f kws kw-args (apply list* rest-args)))))
(check-equal? (contracted-apply + (list 1 2 3)) 6)
(define (kinetic-energy #:mass m #:velocity v)
(* 1/2 m (sqr v)))
(check-equal? (contracted-apply kinetic-energy #:mass 2 #:velocity 1 '()) 1)
(with-handlers ([exn:fail:contract? void])
(contracted-apply 5 (list 1 2 3 4))
(error 'contracted-apply-not-a-function "control flow should not reach this point"))
On Dec 28, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
> This is my first try at making something like a make-keyword-procedure-contract. Any suggestions or things I did wrong?
> By the way it doesn't seem like a good idea to put separate contracts on the kws and kw-args, but that's what I did for now because I don't need to check anything about the keywords. Also, the error messages aren't the best.
>
> #lang racket
>
> (require rackunit)
>
> (define ((make-keyword-procedure-contract-proj kws-contract-proj kw-args-contract-proj rest-contract-proj range-contract-proj) blame)
> (lambda (f)
> (unless (procedure? f)
> (raise-blame-error blame f
> '(expected: "procedure?" given: "~e") f))
> (make-keyword-procedure
> (lambda (kws kw-args . rest-args)
> (let ([kws-blame (blame-add-context blame "the keyword list of" #:swap? #t)]
> [kw-args-blame (blame-add-context blame "the kw-arguments list of" #:swap? #t)]
> [rest-args-blame (blame-add-context blame "the arguments list of" #:swap? #t)]
> [range-blame (blame-add-context blame "the rage of")])
> (call-with-values (lambda () (keyword-apply f
> ((kws-contract-proj kws-blame) kws)
> ((kw-args-contract-proj kw-args-blame) kw-args)
> ((rest-contract-proj rest-args-blame) rest-args)))
> (range-contract-proj range-blame)))))))
>
> (define (make-keyword-procedure-contract kws-contract kw-args-contract rest-contract range-contract)
> (make-contract #:name `(make-keyword-procedure-contract ,kws-contract ,kw-args-contract ,rest-contract ,range-contract)
> #:first-order (lambda (f) (procedure? f))
> #:projection (apply make-keyword-procedure-contract-proj
> (map contract-projection
> (list kws-contract kw-args-contract
> rest-contract range-contract)))))
>
> (define-syntax match?/c
> (syntax-rules ()
> [(match?/c pat)
> (flat-named-contract '(match?/c pat)
> (lambda (x)
> (match x
> [pat #t]
> [_ #f])))]
> [(match?/c pat #:when condition)
> (flat-named-contract '(match?/c pat #:when condition)
> (lambda (x)
> (match x
> [pat #:when condition #t]
> [_ #f])))]
> ))
>
>
> (with-handlers ([exn:fail:contract? (compose1 displayln exn-message)])
> (define/contract not-a-function (make-keyword-procedure-contract (listof keyword?) list?
> list?
> (const #t))
> "not-a-function")
> (void))
>
> (newline)
>
> (define/contract contracted-apply (make-keyword-procedure-contract (listof keyword?) list?
> (match?/c (list (? procedure? f) arg ... (? list? rest-args)))
> (const #t))
> (make-keyword-procedure
> (lambda (kws kw-args f . rest-args)
> (keyword-apply f kws kw-args (apply list* rest-args)))))
>
> (check-equal? (contracted-apply + (list 1 2 3))
> 6)
>
> (define (kinetic-energy #:mass m #:velocity v)
> (* 1/2 m (sqr v)))
>
> (check-equal? (contracted-apply kinetic-energy #:mass 2 #:velocity 1 '())
> 1)
>
> (with-handlers ([exn:fail:contract? (compose1 displayln exn-message)])
> (contracted-apply 5 (list 1 2 3 4)))
>
> On Dec 28, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/Building_New_Contract_Combinators.html?q=racketcontract
>>
>> (But there is a new interface (the old one will continue to work of course) in the git version)
>>
>> Let me know if you have questions or get stuck and I'll try to improve the docs.
>>
>> Robby
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Alexander D. Knauth <alexander at knauth.org> wrote:
>> What's the lower-level, projection-based api and how do I use it?
>>
>> On Dec 28, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
>>
>>> I think you probably could make a contract that did what you were talking about in the first message in this thread, but you cannot do it with any of the existing contract combinators (->, ->*, case->, ->i, etc). You would have to use the lower-level, projection-based api to make a new combinator.
>>>
>>> But Matthias's advice is probably a better route.
>>>
>>> Robby
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Alexander D. Knauth <alexander at knauth.org> wrote:
>>> The problem isn't with defining the function, the problem is with making a contract for it.
>>>
>>> I can define the function fine, I just don't know how to write a contract for it. I used make-keyword-procedure to define the function, but is there something like make-keyword-procedure-contract? I could write my own error code, but it would be better if I could express it as a contract.
>>>
>>> The actual concrete example is that I'm making my own version of send that works with method-like procedures.
>>>
>>> #lang racket
>>>
>>> (define/contract current-send-object (parameter/c (or/c object? #f))
>>> (make-parameter #f))
>>>
>>> (define my-send
>>> (make-keyword-procedure
>>> (lambda (kws kw-args object proc . rest-args)
>>> (parameterize ([current-send-object object])
>>> (keyword-apply proc kws kw-args rest-args)))))
>>>
>>> (define point%
>>> (class object%
>>> (super-new)
>>> (init-field [x 0] [y 0])
>>> (define/public (get-x) x)
>>> (define/public (get-y) y)))
>>>
>>> (define (get-vector)
>>> (let* ([object (current-send-object)]
>>> [x (send object get-x)]
>>> [y (send object get-y)])
>>> (vector x y)))
>>>
>>> (define p (new point% [x 3] [y 5]))
>>>
>>> (require rackunit)
>>>
>>> (check-equal? (my-send p get-vector)
>>> (vector 3 5))
>>>
>>> (check-equal? (my-send p (compose vector->list get-vector))
>>> (list 3 5))
>>>
>>> that way you can define new "methods" without them being specified by the class, and they're first class functions. I wanted to be able to make a contract for my-send (and my-send/apply etc.) that would check that object is an object and that proc is a procedure, but still take arbitrary keyword arguments and just pass them on to proc.
>>>
>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a bit vague. Can you clarify the question with a concrete example?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 26, 2013, at 7:45 PM, "Alexander D. Knauth" <alexander at knauth.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I want to make contracts on some apply-like functions that check some arguments but just passes all the others (including keyword arguments) on to a function (provided as an argument). If there weren't any keyword arguments, I could use a rest argument to do this, but that wouldn't work with keyword arguments. Is there a way to do something like a rest argument for keyword-arguments in a contract?____________________
>>>>> Racket Users list:
>>>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________
>>> Racket Users list:
>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20131229/be91db4b/attachment-0001.html>