[racket] struct #:methods question

From: Asumu Takikawa (asumu at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Wed Aug 28 10:15:33 EDT 2013

On 2013-08-28 11:14:50 +0200, Tobias Hammer wrote:
> Can anyone explain the part with the #f to me? Does it mean that i
> have to (define some-gen-fun #f) to indicate it's not implemented?
> But that seems to have no real impact as i get the exactly same
> error with just leaving it out?

I think this is a mistake in the documentation. You are allowed to leave
out any method definitions (without a #f definition). We probably forgot
to delete that sentence after changing the syntax of method definitions
at some point.


Posted on the users mailing list.