[racket] (procedure? (hash)) -> true

On 2013-08-05 11:30:23 -0400, John Griffin wrote:
>    It certainly would be handy from a succinctness standpoint if a hash acted
>    like a procedure (Any -> Any).  Noticing that struct can be a procedure?
>    via a property , I wonder if there's a way for hash? and procedure? to
>    both hold true.

You might be interested in Greg Hendershott's #lang rackjure:
  https://github.com/greghendershott/rackjure

Cheers,
Asumu