[racket] Using prefix-out with contract-out together
On 03/08/13 08:00, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> That sounds like a bug in contract-out and/or prefix-out. There's no
> reason they shouldn't work right together. And I can confirm the bug
> -- the bindings get exported with contracts, but by their original
> names. I assume that's the behavior you're seeing as well.
Yes, that's the behaviour I'm seeing.
I was just about to issue a bug report before finishing this email, when
I noticed that you have done so.
I was delayed a little as I was trying to work out the directory
structure of the racket repo, so that I could
find the tests for prefix-out and contract-out.
bfn
Lorry
>
> Carl Eastlund
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Lawrence Woodman
> <lwoodman at vlifesystems.com <mailto:lwoodman at vlifesystems.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to prefix the functions that I want to export from a
> module and
> provide a contract for each exported function. I tried the
> following style:
>
> (provide
> (prefix-out mymodule-
> (contract-out
> [func-a (-> string? any)]
> [func-b (-> string? any)])))
>
> I realise that the code above doesn't work because contract-out is
> trying to bind
> the contracts to the un-prefixed names. Is there is cleaner way
> of doing this,
> rather than just renaming the functions at definition time and
> using the full name
> for the contracts?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Lorry
>
> --
> vLife Systems Ltd
> Registered Office: The Meridian, 4 Copthall House, Station Square,
> Coventry, CV1 2FL
> Registered in England and Wales No. 06477649
> http://vlifesystems.com
>
> ____________________
> Racket Users list:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>
>
--
vLife Systems Ltd
Registered Office: The Meridian, 4 Copthall House, Station Square, Coventry, CV1 2FL
Registered in England and Wales No. 06477649
http://vlifesystems.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130804/f00c756c/attachment.html>