[racket] unrequire for modules, or a new, clean sub-context?

From: Stephen Chang (stchang at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 26 22:28:57 EDT 2013

You may also be interested in except-in, only-in, or rename-in.

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Grant Rettke <grettke at acm.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Sanjeev K Sharma <throwit1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> what do you do when you get the same procedure name between two required modules?  This is the key question,
>> the next 2 are to further my understanding of (require ...) binding.
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/require.html#(form._((lib._racket/private/base..rkt)._prefix-in))
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Posted on the users mailing list.