[racket] Redex question: parameterizing a language definition

From: Lindsey Kuper (lkuper at cs.indiana.edu)
Date: Wed Apr 3 23:54:36 EDT 2013

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:08 PM, David Van Horn <dvanhorn at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> This is a recurring issue with no current solution (as far as I know).
>
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2012-December/055488.html

Okay, thanks for the answers, David and Robby.  It sounds like
transitive reinterpretation, as David put it, is indeed what I wish I
had here.  (And a module system for Redex would be very cool!)

Lindsey

Posted on the users mailing list.