[racket] confusion about shadowing predefined functions in interactions window

Thanks, these emails explain things fairly clearly.

It's worth noting that as more functions get added to racket, it becomes
more likely to trip across this.  In particular, we hit this only because
range was added between 5.2 and 5.3.

--Dan

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Asumu Takikawa <asumu at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:

> On 2012-10-23 08:48:35 -0700, Dan Grossman wrote:
> >    Thanks, David.* I would be interested in someone walking through how
> this
> >    behavior arises -- as well as the design issue regarding the "hopeless
> >    top-level"
>
> A few months ago, I collected all of the instances of "the top-level is
> hopeless" that I could find from the archives and collected them here:
>   https://gist.github.com/3083053
>
> I think this e-mail in particular is relevant:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2008-September/027474.html
>
> Cheers,
> Asumu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20121023/f9dfc324/attachment.html>