[racket] translate from Racket to Common Lisp

From: Patrick Useldinger (uselpa.list at gmail.com)
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:05:03 EST 2012

On 05/11/2012 19:14, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> A follow-up blog post detailing what's improved performance-wise would
> be great.

Indeed, speed is an important point for many people choosing a PL 
implementation. And it's becoming even more important with ubiquitous 
virtualisation and energy considerations.

May I suggest adding Bigloo to the comparison. I have run a few tests in 
the past and Bigloo was always faster than Racket, Gambit and Chicken.


Posted on the users mailing list.