From: Patrick Useldinger (uselpa.list at gmail.com) Date: Mon Nov 5 14:05:03 EST 2012 |
|
On 05/11/2012 19:14, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > A follow-up blog post detailing what's improved performance-wise would > be great. Indeed, speed is an important point for many people choosing a PL implementation. And it's becoming even more important with ubiquitous virtualisation and energy considerations. May I suggest adding Bigloo to the comparison. I have run a few tests in the past and Bigloo was always faster than Racket, Gambit and Chicken. -pu
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|