[racket] translate from Racket to Common Lisp
Nice! Thanks.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> 2668 msecs when I declare `cycle-length' as `(Integer -> Integer)' and
> change `(even? n)' to `else', or 2809 msecs if I add `[else 0]' instead
> of changing `(even? n)'.
>
> At Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:30:21 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
>> And just to complete the list, how does the TR version fare?
>>
>> Robby
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Sometimes, a x3 difference means that we're missing a straightforward
>> > opportunity in performance, and that was the case here. The Racket
>> > program spent most of its time in generic `/' by pessimistically
>> > expecting a non-integer result.
>> >
>> > I've adjusted the JIT to optimistically compute and check a fixnum
>> > result for a division of fixnums, and then the example runs about four
>> > times as fast on my machine:
>> >
>> > Old Racket: 12589 msec
>> > New Racket: 3850 msec
>> > Racket with `quotient': 3851 msec [old or new is the same]
>> > SBCL: 5553 msec
>> > SBCL, unsafe fixnum: 2692 msec
>> > New Racket, in module: 2823 msec
>> > Racket, unsafe fixnum: 2405 msec [uses `fxquotient']
>> >
>> > At Sun, 4 Nov 2012 15:54:51 +0000 (UTC), daniel rupistraliz wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> racket:
>> >> Welcome to Racket v5.2.1.
>> >> > (define (cycle-length n)
>> >> (cond
>> >> [(= n 1)
>> >> 1]
>> >> [(odd? n)
>> >> (add1 (cycle-length (add1 (* 3 n))))]
>> >> [(even? n)
>> >> (add1 (cycle-length (/ n 2)))]))
>> >>
>> >> (time (for ([i (in-range 1 1000000)])
>> >> (cycle-length i)))
>> >> >
>> >> cpu time: 15016 real time: 15018 gc time: 0
>> >>
>> >> sbcl:
>> >>
>> >> (defun cycle-length(n)
>> >> (cond ((= n 1) 1)
>> >> ((oddp n) (1+ (cycle-length (1+ (* 3 n)))))
>> >> ((evenp n) (1+ (cycle-length (/ n 2))))))
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> * (time (loop for i from 1 to 1000000 do (cycle-length i)))
>> >>
>> >> Evaluation took:
>> >> 6.192 seconds of real time
>> >> 6.192387 seconds of total run time (6.192387 user, 0.000000 system)
>> >> 100.00% CPU
>> >> 14,496,643,427 processor cycles
>> >> 0 bytes consed
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> With optimizations:
>> >>
>> >> (defun cycle-length(n)
>> >> (declare (fixnum n)
>> >> (ftype (function (fixnum) fixnum) cycle-length)
>> >> (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0) (compilation-speed 0)))
>> >> (cond ((= n 1) 1)
>> >> ((oddp n) (the fixnum (1+ (cycle-length
>> >> (the fixnum (1+ (the fixnum (* 3 n))))))))
>> >> ((evenp n) (cycle-length (the fixnum (/ n 2))))))
>> >>
>> >> CL-USER> (time (loop for i from 1 to (expt 10 6) do (cycle-length i)))
>> >> Evaluation took:
>> >> 3.515 seconds of real time
>> >> 3.524220 seconds of total run time (3.524220 user, 0.000000 system)
>> >> 100.26% CPU
>> >> 8,228,949,701 processor cycles
>> >> 33,008 bytes consed
>> >>
>> >> So racket = 15 seconds
>> >> sbcl = 6 seconds
>> >> sbcl optimized = 3.5 seconds.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ____________________
>> >> Racket Users list:
>> >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>> > ____________________
>> > Racket Users list:
>> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users