[racket] Requiring SRFI

From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org)
Date: Thu Nov 1 14:27:43 EDT 2012


20 minutes ago, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> Is there an easy way to require everything in a given SRFI, while
> specifying that in a case of name conflict, I want to use the
> built-in racket version?
> I'm specifically thinking about srfi/13, the string library.  I want
> to include that, but I think Racket's newly added string functions
> (such as string-trim and string-join) are better than the ones in
> the srfi.

          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Posted on the users mailing list.