From: Harry Spier (vasishtha.spier at gmail.com) Date: Sun May 27 09:30:11 EDT 2012 |
|
Is the "for" form a macro? And if so how difficult would it be to make a new form "for-with-look-around" that had built in look-back and look-ahead operators (next x) (prior x) ( next?) (prior?). So you could do something like: ((define (running-average-of-3 l) (for-with-look-around ([x (in-list l)]) (unless? (or (prior?) (next?)) (displayln (/ (+ x (prior x) (next x)) 3))))))
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|