[racket] `def' ?

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:26 PM, ozzloy-racket-users
<ozzloy+users_racket-lang_org at gmail.com> wrote:
> am i the only one that thinks not having abbreviated names for anything is
> good?

no.

> i like not having "def".  especially if it's going to be redundant.
> i see this as a slippery slope i don't want to go down.
> it annoys me when switching to other languages to have to ask: which way of
> shortening "function" does this language go with?  was it "fn"? maybe "fun"?
> if the language has a strict policy of not using short versions of words, i
> don't have to guess.

*APPLAUSE*

P.