[racket] In need of flexpt

2012/5/7 Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu>:
> I'd expect `flexpt' to be the same as `expt', but constrained to flonum
> arguments, which would make it the same as
>
>  (define (flexpt a x)
>   (if (and (flonum? a) (flonum? x))
>       (expt a x)
>       (error ...s)))
>
> I agree that it would make a fine addition to `racket/flonum', but is
> that what you had in mind?

Yes, exactly.

/Jens Axel