[racket] Typed Racket - Parameterized Structures

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Matthias Felleisen
<matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> Typed Racket isn't Racket. It's supposed to introduce some sanity.

I want programming in Typed Racket to be a Racket-like experience,
more than I want Typed Racket to conform to some other set of
aesthetic preferences (even mine).

> Is (All (All) (All -> All)) a type?

No, that doesn't parse, so there's clearly an inconsistency here.  I
will have to think about the best way to resolve it.

> On Mar 14, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Matthias Felleisen
>> <matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 14, 2012, at 8:28 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>>
>>>> 1. You added `All' in the type parameter list for `struct:'.  You
>>>> don't need that there, and instead it was adding a third type
>>>> parameter to `Cvt'.
>>>
>>> Perhaps All shouldn't be allowed there.
>>
>> I thought of that as well, but we don't normally restrict binding
>> names in Racket.  For example, this is a perfectly good replacement
>> for `list':
>>
>> (lambda lambda lambda)
>>
>> :)
>> --
>> sam th
>> samth at ccs.neu.edu
>



-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu