From: Adolfo Pérez Álvarez (adolfo.pa at gmail.com) Date: Wed Jun 27 07:54:33 EDT 2012 |
|
> > Looking at this smaller example, I think that the nested recursion in > expansion of `for*/list` is confusing Typed Racket. I'll look into > why that is, and if it can be fixed. In the meantime, you ought to be > able to rewrite the loop to use `for/fold:` and `reverse` to work > around this issue. > Ok, I won't use for*/list: then. Thanks a lot for your help, Sam
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|