[racket] FFI require statement

From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org)
Date: Fri Jul 27 11:02:24 EDT 2012

20 minutes ago, Harry Spier wrote:
> Thanks Eli,
> I'm using version 6.7.3 Q16 and it covers the functions I need with
> the exception of one but using your FFI example it was easy to
> create an FFI call to that function.  There are a fair number of new
> functions since your FFI was written.  I believe version 7 is going
> to change the API significantly for certain functions.  At some
> point in time I think I will update your ImageMagick FFI to cover
> all of the functions but that could be several years in the future.

Yeah that would be good -- and also I won't be surprised if they'll
add (or already have) some description of the API that is better than
just the C header files.

(And BTW, I think that I originally had the same quantum size, so with
different values there might be some bugs.)

          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Posted on the users mailing list.