From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Tue Jul 24 18:39:43 EDT 2012 |
|
On Jul 24, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote: > He knows it doesn't eat *his* dog. He can only know that for a finite > number of sample dogs, however. Any given user's dog might turn out > to be more appetizing than those tested. This sounds like a rathe existential argument
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|