[racket] Typed Racket - Recursive Types (Little help please)

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Ray Racine <ray.racine at gmail.com> wrote:
> While it does work, there is definitely a loss of informative intent in the
> sense of the "documentation" to the human reader provided by the type
> signatures.  If define-type is strictly an aliasing then the original
> construction should work and its failure a bug.  Do you agree?  If so I'll
> open a bug report.

This appears to be a bug -- TR complains about a non-regular type, but
the type is actually regular -- the right hand side of `Continuation`
just re-uses `A` and `D`.  So filing a bug report would be great.

-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu