[racket] MysterX poll

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Fri Jan 6 13:36:36 EST 2012

At Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:56:24 -0200, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote:
> I'm not actually using MysterX, but for what I understood, shouldn't the
> above sentence read the opposite?
> 
> "... porting from `mysterx' to `ffi/com' (the new implementation) will be
> encouraged."

Right - thanks!



Posted on the users mailing list.