From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Fri Jan 6 13:36:36 EST 2012 |
|
At Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:56:24 -0200, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote: > I'm not actually using MysterX, but for what I understood, shouldn't the > above sentence read the opposite? > > "... porting from `mysterx' to `ffi/com' (the new implementation) will be > encouraged." Right - thanks!
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|