[racket] Splitting Racket source code by scope?

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 28 16:51:36 EST 2012

The key distinction is setting parameters at compile time (which is when include happens) and run time (which is what Rüdiger did). I have sent along an explanation of how units may solve his problem in a better way. -- Matthias

On Feb 28, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Rüdiger Asche <rac at ruediger-asche.de> wrote:
>> yes, but the docs for include also say that "If the source is not a complete
>> path string, then path-spec is resolved relative to
>> (current-load-relative-directory) if it is not #f, or relative to
>> (current-directory) otherwise." Is that a documentation bug then?
> What happens when you parameterize current-load-relative-directory,
> instead of current-directory?

Posted on the users mailing list.