[racket] Challenge: <impressive function> in 140 chars or less

What if we further require quines to apply at least one function that 
they contain? I want to include Eduardo's function in the class of 
"impressive" ones.

Neil ⊥

On 02/24/2012 06:35 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> This is pretty boring too. :)
>
>> ""
> ""
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Neil Toronto<neil.toronto at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I dunno. It might work better if we require quines to produce themselves in
>> quoted form. Then the empty program isn't one.
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> On 02/24/2012 06:28 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>>>
>>> Doesn't work as well in Racket as in Scheme, that one!
>>>
>>> Robby
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Eduardo Bellani<ebellani at gmail.com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Does this count?
>>>>
>>>> ((λ (x) (list x (list 'quote x))) '(λ (x) (list x (list 'quote x))))
>>>>
>>>> On 02/23/2012 04:52 PM, Gary Baumgartner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:04:50PM -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is this thing? It seems coolly symmetric in this view:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomae%27s_function
>>>>> ____________________
>>>>>    Racket Users list:
>>>>>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Eduardo Bellani
>>>>
>>>> fear is an alarm, not a compass.
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________
>>>    Racket Users list:
>>>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>
>>
>> ____________________
>>   Racket Users list:
>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users