[racket] Style mistakes (was: static variables question)

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 00:10, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:

> 20 minutes ago, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote:
> > It is possible to replace a pattern like this:
> >
> > (cond
> >    [..a..]
> >    [else (cond
> >                [..b..]
> >                ...)])
> >
> > With this simpler:
> >
> > (cond
> >    [..a..]
> >    [..b..]
> >     ...)
>
> Speaking about such transformations and about things like (if E #t #f),
> I have some code which I run against student submissions to find style
> problems like these, and using syntax transformations means that it's
> easy to make it actually suggest the transformation.  For example,
> feeding it this code:
> [...]



 Sounds really interesting! Maybe it would be like a "Racket-lint" ;)


BTW I just found the nested-cond pattern appearing on HtDP, throughout
section 9:
http://htdp.org/2003-09-26/Book/curriculum-Z-H-13.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20120221/4a39f7ec/attachment.html>