[racket] internal define

Correct, I used promises and make-set!-transformer.
Jos

-----Original Message-----
From: Eli Barzilay [mailto:eli at barzilay.org] 
Sent: jueves, 27 de diciembre de 2012 14:48
To: Jos Koot
Cc: Matthias Felleisen; J. Ian Johnson; Dmitry Pavlov; users at racket-lang.org
Subject: Re: [racket] internal define

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jos Koot <jos.koot at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some years ago I had a discussion with Eli Barzilay about a different
> approach to letrec. The idea was to evaluate the expressions of the
bindings
> automatically in appropriate order. As an example:

I don't think that I had an imlpementation of it...  IIRC, you had
something that used promises to make it simple to implement.

--
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!