[racket] Custodians and Places

Good to know.  May have missed it, but the Custodian doc does not mention
Place as a managed resource.
On Dec 4, 2012 6:56 PM, "Matthew Flatt" <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:

> At Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:31:38 -0500, Ray Racine wrote:
> > Should a Place (a true locally spawned Place via dynamic-place) be
> eligible
> > for Custodian management in a similar vein as with other resources such
> at
> > threads, sockets, ports et al?
>
> Yes, places are managed by custodians.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20121204/f458d0ee/attachment.html>