[racket] Fwd: Most negative/positive fixnum

From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org)
Date: Tue Dec 4 15:09:05 EST 2012

[Bah, please ignore this, I didn't change the email address.  There's
probably a second one that will follow...]


10 minutes ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just checked the spam folder on the gmail account that filters the
> racket users list, and found a post that you sent (forwarded below).
> The reason that gmail said for this is just:
> 
>   Why is this message in Spam? It's similar to messages that were
>   detected by our spam filters.  Learn more
> 
> and the "Learn more" is linked to here:
> 
>   http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&ctx=mail&answer=1366858&expand=5
> 
> Perhaps it will if you resend it now after I moved it out of the spam
> bin.
> 
> 
> A few minutes ago, users Racket wrote:
> > Why is this message in Spam? It's similar to messages that were
> > detected by our spam filters.  Learn more
> > 
> > 
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Diogo F. S. Ramos <diogofsr at gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:22 PM
> > Subject: Most negative/positive fixnum
> > To: users at racket-lang.org
> > 
> > 
> > Does Racket have a constant for the most negative/positive fixnum on the
> > running architecture?

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Posted on the users mailing list.