[racket] Goldilocks: install too big, install-plain too slow

Nevermind, my bad, I was using a "uninstalled racket3m" binary. 
~/src/racket/build/racket/racket3m

On 12/04/2012 10:06 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Really?  What happened with the command I posted?  It certainly works
> for me here.
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Kevin Tew <tewk at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> On 12/04/2012 08:53 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel at heroku.com> wrote:
>>>> I have tried the install-plain make target and it is indeed much
>>>> smaller, but it compiles/installs very little -- no raco, and
>>>> apparently very little byte-compiling, because the racket REPL takes
>>>> an age to load -- so it's basically unworkable.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a reasonable in-between option?
>>> One way to get an in-between option would be to use `make
>>> plain-install` and then manually setup the relevant collections.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, this is a little more inconvenient than it could be
>>> because `plain-install` doesn't install `raco` -- perhaps this can be
>>> added, or a make target could be added that did this.
>>>
>>> But even without `raco`, you should be able to run `racket -l- setup
>>> -D racket web-server` to just set up the `racket` and `web-server`
>>> collections, as an example (`-D` skips the documentation, which you
>>> probably don't need on Heroku).  Some simple experimentation should
>>> determine the right set of collections.
>>> --
>>> sam th
>>> samth at ccs.neu.edu
>>> ____________________
>>>     Racket Users list:
>>>     http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>> I had to type `racket -l- setup -D -l racket web-server` to get this to work
>> for me.
>>
>> Kevin
>
>