[racket] Racket blog post: Fully Inlined Merge Sort

I've edited the post, so there's no problem anymore. I also changed 
`drop' and `take' to `split-at', as Ian suggested.

On 08/24/2012 03:56 PM, Adolfo Pérez Álvarez wrote:
> Appending "?m=1" to the URL does the trick also:
>
> http://blog.racket-lang.org/2012/08/fully-inlined-merge-sort.html?m=1
>
> 2012/8/24 Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu>:
>>
>> The code is fully visible in Safari's rss feed reader.
>>
>>
>> On Aug 24, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/24/2012 03:22 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
>>>> Very cool.
>>>
>>> :D
>>>
>>>> Is anyone else annoyed at the code being cut off in blog posts, even
>>>> though (thankfully) highlighting and copying gives you the valid code?
>>>
>>> I am. I'm especially annoyed that it happened in a place that readers are most likely to cut and paste. We'll either make a CSS change or I'll edit the post.
>>>
>>> (Editing the post is tricky, though, because it's generated from a Scribble document. And that wouldn't do anything about output in examples being cut off.)
>>>
>>>> Also, I suggest split-at versus a take followed by a drop for a teensy
>>>> performance improvement.
>>>
>>> Always the critic. :p
>>>
>>> Good idea, though. It would also make the code shorter.
>>>
>>> Neil ⊥
>>>
>>> ____________________
>>> Racket Users list:
>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>
>>
>> ____________________
>>    Racket Users list:
>>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>