[racket] Clarification on licensing of Racket code?...

I'm not aware of any licensing problem with Racket, when distributing 
closed-source commercial ".exe" apps as you described.

> by using a free version of Racket, I wouldn't have any possibility to 
> delegate the issue to the developers of Racket (which is fine with me 
> because Racket from racket-lang.org is free).

I suggest considering two things: (1) the long history of the core 
Racket (PLT) developers providing good releases and good support; and 
(2) the option of delegating to a professional consultant if any 
problems arise.

If I saw an advantage to having a commercial Racket distribution, I 
would've done it already.  But I think my clients are best served by 
staying with the canonical Racket distribution (built from source).

Neil V.

-- 
http://www.neilvandyke.org/