From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu) Date: Fri Sep 30 13:05:23 EDT 2011 |
|
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:01 PM, John Clements <clements at brinckerhoff.org> wrote: > In my world, a change will fall into the "yes, racket is a rapidly changing language" bin; > it's not unusual for much of my old code to be broken. I realize this is a meta question, but is this the world we really want Racket to be in? Robby
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|