[racket] Argument order conventions (was: Variable naming conventions)

Are there any general "thoughts" written somewhere about the order of
arguments?
I find myself often calling functions and getting the order of the arguments
wrong.

(Maybe I just need to be more familiarized with them...)

[]'s

Rodolfo Carvalho


On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 19:00, Norman Gray <norman at astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote:

>
> Jeremy, hello.
>
> On 2011 Sep 14, at 22:14, Jeremy Kun wrote:
>
> > Are there any other significant naming conventions I may run across?
> perhaps using some of ~ @ $ ^ & . _ + = . Is it considered bad form to use
> full UTF characters in identifiers?
>
> I've asked this same question in the past, and the list of links I've been
> variously pointed to are:
>
> http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention (seems to say
> it all, as far as I can see)
> http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/link/952/lisp-style-rules (brief)
> http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/style.txt (interesting, but probably
> indicating it'd be best not to be seated next to the author on a long
> journey)
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Norman
>
>
> --
> Norman Gray  :  http://nxg.me.uk
> SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK
>
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20110914/b0c5e450/attachment.html>