[racket] arity of + versus <=

From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org)
Date: Fri Oct 28 14:39:27 EDT 2011

40 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I would expect
> (not (and (apply < x) (apply > x)))
> to be true for all x

This, and many other points, were all part of a pretty big thread on
the R6RS list a while ago.


Since so much verbiage was used then, it would be useful to go over
it in this context too.

          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Posted on the users mailing list.