| From: Joe Marshall (jmarshall at alum.mit.edu) Date: Fri Oct 28 11:12:39 EDT 2011 |
|
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Dan Grossman <djg at cs.washington.edu> wrote: > Very minor point, but is there a rationale beyond historical precedent > for + and * to allow any number of arguments but, =, <=, <, >, >= to > require at least two arguments? 0 is the additive identity. 1 is the multiplicative identity. What is the equality identity? -- ~jrm
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}